How did Jesus approach his future? How did the changes of his day impact his horizon? What can we learn from his context that will help us create a more sustainable future?
I’ve been thinking about these questions for some time. In 2008 Futures journal published a scholarly article I wrote on this subject. In this article I examine how Jesus shaped his mid-range horizon based on the the changes of his day. And I asked what we can learn from his context that will help us create a more sustainable 21st century.
This citation for the article is: Gary, J. (2008, Sept.). The future according to Jesus: A Galilean model of foresight. Futures, 40(7), 630-642. [see the article outline below]
In the Galilean model I propose that Jesus saw the future as a dynamic of three paths: Conventional, Counter and Creative. Most people think Jesus was fixed on the long-range future, but I argue his focus was on dynamics that would play out in his society.
A historical reading of Jesus in his social context in Second Temple Judaism is not new. My paper, however, attempts to resolve issues that scholars have yet to address. Jesus, like any strategic or global leader, likely envisioned various horizons of the future: the immediate, the near-term, the generation, and the long-term.
I call this field contextual eschatology, with scholars writing on like N.T. Wright or Scott McKnight, along with more popular authors, such as Brian McLaren. This field contextualizes the notion of the kingdom of God, or its’ already/not yet poles to the decisive events which the Jesus movement faced, from the crucifixion of Jesus in 30 A.D. to the failed national Jewish Revolt in A.D. 70.
I wrote this scholarly article to my peers, who teach futures studies at the graduate level. I encourage them not to overlook Jesus as part of the pre-history of our practice, just because Christian fundamentalism and Zionists misread apocalyptic literature.
If you are faculty in a college or university context, in history, sociology, political science, theology, or leadership, and are interested in reading how Jesus relates to the both the crises of the 1st and the 21st century, please download this paper. I welcome your scholarly critique of the Galilean model, and how we can better read the dynamics of our worlds.
2. A first-century Galilean model of foresight
2.1. Jesus’ futures framework
2.1.1. Conventional future
2.1.2. Counter future
2.1.3. Creative future
2.2. The future as landscape
3. The horizon of the kingdom?
3.1. Kingdom as imminent?
3.2. Kingdom as existential?
3.3. Kingdom as inaugurated?
3.4. Kingdom as contextual?
4. Situating Jesus in futures studies
4.1. Teaching the Galilean model
4.2. Connecting to futures studies
4.3. Weighing Jesus as a futurist
Dr. Jay Gary is president of PeakFutures.com, a foresight consulting group. Over the past twenty years he has helped non-profits, foundations, civic leaders, and strategic alliances to create more promise filled futures. He also teaches strategic foresight, innovation and leadership at the graduate level and through professional development courses.